Advanced Mediterranean Diet

I  recently read The Smarter Science of Slim, by Jonathan Bailor and published in 2012.   Per Amazon.com’s rating system, I give it four stars (”I like it”).

♦   ♦   ♦

Mr. Bailor’s weight-management diet avoids grains, most dairy, oils, refined starches, added sugars, starchy veggies, corn, white potatoes.  You eat meat, chicken, eggs, some fruit, nuts, seeds, and copious low-starch vegetables.  No limit on food if you eat the right items.   

It’s high-fiber, high-protein, moderate-fat, moderate-carb (1/3 of calories from carbohydrate,  1/3 from protein, 1/3 from fat).  He considers it Paleo (Stone Age) eating even though he allows moderate legumes and dairy (fat-free or low-fat cottage cheese and plain Greek yogurt).

Will it lead to weight lose? Quite probably in a majority of followers, especially those eating the standard, low-quality American diet.  When it works, it’s because you’ve cut out the fattening carbohydrates so ubiquitous in Western societies.  The protein and fiber will help with satiety.  Is it a safe eating plan?  Yes.

(For those with diabetes needing to lose weight, I prefer a lower carbohydrate content in the diet, something like Conquer Diabetes and Prediabetes: The Low-Carb Mediterranean Diet.  For non-diabetics, is Smarter Science better than my Advanced Mediterranean Diet 2nd Edition?  Of course not, silly!)

I don’t recall any recipes or specific meal plans.  You put your own meals together following his guidelines.

Our major points of agreement:
 - Exercise isn’t terribly helpful as a weight-loss technique for most folks.
 - We’re overweight because we eat too many starches and sweets.
 - Natural, minimally processed foods are healthier than man-made highly refined items.
 - No need to emphasize “organic” /grass-fed beef/free-range chicken.
 - We don’t do enough high-quality exercise.

I have a few problems with the book:
  - It says we’re eating less.  U.S. caloric consumption over the last several decades has increased by about 150 cals (630 kJ) a day for men and 300 cals (1260 kJ) for women.  The author seems to contradict himself at one point by favorably quoting Hilda Bruch’s writing that “…overeating is observed with great regularity” in the obese. 
  - Scary graphs showing increasing instances of heart disease and diabetes over time aren’t helpful because they ignore population growth.  The population-adjusted diabetes rate is indeed increasing whereas heart disease rates are decreasing.
  - It says the Calories In/Calories Out theory of overweight has been proven wrong.  This is by no means true.  It just hasn’t helped us much to reverse the overweight epidemic.  Sure, it’s often said that if you just cut a daily tablespoon of butter out of your diet, you’d lose 11 lb (5 kg) in a year, all other things being equal.  Problem is, all other things are never equal.  In reality, we replace the butter with something else, or we’re slightly less active.  So weight doesn’t change or we gain a little.
  - It says the “eat less, exercise more” mantra has been proven wrong as a weight loss method.  Not really.  See above.  And watch an episode of TV’s “The Biggest Loser.”  Exercise can burn off fat tissue.  The problem is that we tend to overeat within the next 12 hours, replacing the fat we just burned. I agree with the author that “eat less, exercise more” is extremely hard to do, which is the reason it so often fails over the long run.  As Mr. Bailor writes elsewhere: “Hard to do” plus “do not want to do” generally equals “it’s not happening.”  Mr. Bailor would say the reason it ultimately fails is because of a metabolic clog or dysregulation. 
  - He says there’s no relationship between energy (calorie) consumption and overweight.  Not true.  Need references?  Google these: PMID 15516193, PMID 17878287, PMID 14762332.  The author puts too much faith in self-reports of food intake, which are notoriously inaccurate.  And obese folks under-report consumption more than others (this is not to say they’re lying). 
  - Mr. Bailor’s assessments too often rely on rat and mice studies.
  - By page 59, I had found five text sentences that didn’t match up well with the numeric bibiographic references (e.g., pages 48, 50, 59).
  - S. Boyd Eaton is thrice referred to as S. Boyd.
  - How did he miss the research on high intensity interval training by Tabata and colleagues in 1996?  Gibala is mentioned often but he wasn’t the pioneer.
  - Several diagrams throughout the book didn’t print well (not the author’s fault, of course).
  - In several spots, the author implies that HIS specific eating and exercise program has been tested in research settings.  It hasn’t.

Mr. Bailor’s exercise prescription is the most exciting part of the book for me.  His review of the literature indicates you can gain the weight-management and health benefits of exercise with just 10 or 20 minutes a week.  NOT the hour a day recommended by so many public heath authorities.  And he tells you how to do the exercises without a gym membership or expensive equipment.  That 20 minutes is exhausting and not fun.  You have fun in all the hours you saved.  If this pans out, we’re on the cusp of a fitness revolution.  Gym owners won’t be happy.  Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it?

One component of the exercise program is high intensity interval training (HIIT), which I’m recently convinced is better than hours per week of low-intensity “cardio” like jogging. Better in terms of both fitness and weight management.

The resistance training part of the program focuses on low repetitions with high resistance, especially eccentric slow muscle contraction.  This is probably similar to programs recommended by Doug McGuff. John Little, Chris Highcock, and Skyler Tanner.  I’m no authority on this but I’m trying to learn.  By this point in the book, I was tired of looking up his cited references (76 pages!).  I just don’t know if this resistance training style is the way to go or not.  I’ll probably have to just try it on myself. 

I admire Mr. Bailor’s effort to digest and condense decades of nutrition and exercise research.  He succeeds to a large degree.

Steve Parker, M.D.
 

God, help us figure this out

A few months ago, several of the bloggers/writers I follow were involved in an online debate about two competing theories that attempt to explain the current epidemic of overweight and obesity.  The theories:

1. Carboydrate/Insulin (as argued by Gary Taubes)
2. Food Reward (as argued by Stephan Guyenet)

The whole dustup was about as interesting to me as debating how may angels can dance on the head of pin. 

Regular readers here know I’m an advocate of the Carboydrate/Insulin theory.  I cite it in Conquer Diabetes and Prediabetes: The Low-Carb Mediterranean Diet and The Advanced Mediterranean Diet: Lose Weight, Feel Better, Live Longer (2nd edition).  But the Food Reward theory also has validity.  They’re both right, to an extent.  They’re not mutually exclusive.  The Food Reward theory isn’t as well publiziced as Carbohydrate/Insulin.

Dr. Guyenet lays out a masterful defense of the Food Reward theory at his blog.  Mr. Taubes presents his side here, here, here, here, and here.  If you have a couple hours to wade through this, I guess I’d start with Taubes’ posts in the order I list them.  Finish with Guyenet. 

You’d think I’d be more interested in this.  I’m still not.

Moving from theory to real world practicality, I do see that limiting consumption of concentrated refined sugars and starches helps with loss of excess body fat and prevention of weight regain.  Not for everbody, but many.  Whether that’s mediated through lower insulin action or through lower food reward, I don’t care so much. 

Steve Parker, M.D.

h/t Dr. Emily Deans

Rapper Fat Joe is in a YouTube video talking about his 100-lb (45 kg) weight loss by eating low-carb.  He’s not doctor, but he knows a lot about preventing diabetes and heart disease.  He’s livin’ it.

Steve Parker, M.D.

h/t Tom Naughton

Ooooh!  I’m sure they’re shaking in their boots.

I ran across a patient in the emergency department a couple months ago who coincidentally happened to be taking over-the-counter HCG oral drops for help with weight loss.  She didn’t ask my opinion of it, so I didn’t give it.

Now the FDA has sent a stern warning letter to seven HCG diet marketers to cease and desist.  I started seeing ads for homeopathic oral HCG at least a year ago.  And the FDA is just now getting around to the letters?

The Science-Based Medicine blog can teach you about homeopathy.

Here’s a snippet from the first FDA link above:

Miller explains that HCG was first promoted for weight loss in the 1950s. “It faded in the 1970s, especially when it became apparent that there was a lack of evidence to support the use of HCG for weight loss,” she says.

The diet has become popular again and FDA and FTC are taking action on illegal HCG products. “You cannot sell products claiming to contain HCG as an OTC drug product. It’s illegal,” says Brad Pace, team leader and regulatory counsel at FDA’s Health Fraud and Consumer Outreach Branch. “If these companies don’t heed our warnings, they could face enforcement actions, legal penalties or criminal prosecution.” 

You think these HCG marketers didn’t know from the git-go that what they were doing was illegal?

I’d have thought the FDA already had enough poop to start enforcement actions.

But what do I know?

Steve Parker, M.D.

I confess a few transgressions.

1) I had a handful of peanuts coated lightly with sugar crystals.

2) About 10 grams of white chocolate.

3) A piece of frosted chocolate cake.  Hey, my wife insisted and I gotta keep her happy.  When the wife’s not happy, nobody’s happy.  (She’s not an unreasonable person.)

I did couple Core Performance workouts.

Weight at the end of week 2: 170 lb (77.3kg). 

That’s down 2.5 lb over the week (a bit over a kg).  I didn’t expect that.  I have consciously been restricting my calories a bit, knowing I’d have to weigh-in and report here.  And I want to fit into my suit pants again!  It’s my version of hari hachi bu.

As I noted at the start of this experiment, I’m going “off plan” around Christmas.  Wouldn’t be surprised if I gained a few pounds back.  A good strategy would be to get in three workouts in the next week.  Also, when I indulge my sweet tooth, perhaps I should skip a meal, instead of doing both a meal and dessert.  I’m not going to sweat it.  There’s always next year for  a fresh start.

I don’t miss bread.  I miss sweets.

If you’re serious about avoiding holiday weight-gain or a weight-loss stall, you need to commit to a specific plan before the holiday arrives.

I’m thinking lots about my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.  Merry Christmas to all my readers!

Steve Parker, M.D.

  Dr. Barry Sears (Ph.D., I think) recently wrote about a lecture he attended by a dietitian affiliated with “The Biggest Loser” TV show.  She revealed the keys to weight-loss success on the show.  Calorie restriction is a major feature, with the typical 300-pounder (136 kg) eating 1,750 calories a day.  On my Advanced Mediterranean Diet, 300-pounders get 2,300 calories (men) or 1,900 calories (women). 

Although not stressed by Dr. Sears, my impression is that contestants exercise a huge amount. 

Go to the link above and you’ll learn that all contestants are paid to participate.  In researching my Conquer Diabetes and Prediabetes book, I learned that the actual Biggest Loser wins $250,000 (USD).  Also, “The Biggest Loser” is an international phenomenon with multiple countries hosting their own versions, with different pay-off amounts.  A former winner, Ali Vincent, lives in my part of the world and still has some celebrity status.

This TV show demonstrates that the calories in/calories out theory of body weight still applies.  Including the fact that massive exercise can help significantly with weight loss.  In real-world situations, exercise probably contributes only a small degree to loss of excess weight.  The major take-home point of the show, for me, is that you can indeed make food and physical activity choices that determine your weight.

Most of us watch too much

I know losing 50 to 10o pounds of fat (25–45 kg) and keeping it off for a couple years is hard; most folks can’t do it.  Do you think you’d be more successful if I gave you $250,ooo for your success?

Steve Parker, M.D.

I had one inadvertent transgression.  To go with chili, my wife made some cornbread from a box mix.  I ate a muffin before reading the label.  It’s cornbread; I figured it was made of corn. 

Wrong. 

Ingredients in order: bleached enriched wheat flour, sugar, corn, etc. 

Even flour’s not flour any more.  The flour had six or seven ingredients listed after it parenthetically: additives.  What they took out in processing, they’re partially replacing.

So far I’m having no trouble bypassing the ever-present cookies, bagels, cinnamon rolls, and blueberry muffins in the doctors’ lounge at the hospital.  My public commitment in this blog improves my will power.  (You can get a free blog from Wordpress.)

Over the last week I’ve had a few servings of beans and potatoes.  I’m eating mostly meat, chicken, fish, salads with fatty dressing, low-carb vegetables, berries, and an occasional glass of wine.  Blackberries are very afforable in Arizona right now.

I shoehorned a couple workouts into the week, 45 minutes each.

Weight Loss Progress Thus Far

Weight: 172.5 lb (78.4 kg) so down a half pound (0.2 kg) in first week.  Had hoped for more, but not too bad.  At least I didn’t gain!  Weight yesterday was actually 170 lb but higher today.

I may yet fit back into those suit pants.  But I have a long way to go.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Compared to a low-fat diet, a very-low-carb diet yielded better fat loss and improved adiponectin levels, according to researchers at the University of Cincinnati.  So what?

Adiponectin is a hormone-like protein secreted by fat cells. But the fatter you are, the less adiponectin you have in your bloodstream.  This hormone has several effects: 

• it’s anti-inflammatory
• high levels of one form of it (a high molecular weight oligomer) are linked to lower rates of diabetes
• low circulating levels are associatedwith athersclerosis (hardening of the arteries), high blood pressure, and impaired function of cells lining our arteries
• it sensitizes the liver and muscles to insulin, which helps keep blood sugars under control

In summary, it’s a good thing to have around.  Low levels are linked to illnesses.  Overweight and obesity tend to lower your levels of adiponectin.  If you’re overweight and have low levels of adiponectin, you should be healthier if you can raise your levels.  How do you do that?  Lose weight.

U. of Cincinnati investigators wanted to know if a very-low-carb diet would increase adiponectin levels better than a common low-fat weight loss diet.  They randomized 81 obese women to follow either a low-fat diet (American Heart Association Step 1) or a very-low-carbohydrate diet based on the Atkins diet.  Women followed the diets for either four or six months.

Findings

Both groups lost weight, but the very-low-carb group lost more: 9.1 kg loss for very-low-carb vs 4.97  for the low-fat group.

The very-low-carb group lost more body fat: 5.45 kg vs 2.62 kg.  (Fat loss was determined by DEXA scan.)

Adiponectin increased in the VLC group but not the LF group.

Discussion

We can’t tell from this article if adiponectin results would be the same in men.  The authors didn’t mention.

In fairness, the authors cite another similar study that found equal degrees of weight loss and adiponectin increase in both low-fat and low-carb groups.  It was a year-long intervention and average weight loss was 13.5% for both groups, a greater degree of weight loss than in the study at hand, in which the very-low-carb group lost 10% of body weight and the low-fat group lost 5.4%.  So you can probably increase your leptin with a low-fat diet if you lose enough excess weight.

Would the Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet work just as well as the very-low carb diet used in this study?  I suspect so, but don’t have the $500,000 it would take to do the research.  Care to donate?

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:  Summer, Suzanne, et al.  Adiponectin changes in relation to the macronutrient composition of a weight-loss diet.  Obesity, 2011. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.60

Intentional weight loss didn’t have any effect either way on risk of death, according to recent research out of Baltimore.  Surprising, huh?

Obesity tends to shorten lifespan, mostly due to higher rates of cancer and cardiovascular disease like heart attacks and strokes.  Doctors and dietitians recommend loss of excess weight all day long, figuring it will reduce the risk of obesity-related death and disease.  That’s not necessarily the case, however.  It’s called the “obesity paradox“: some types of overweight and obese patients actually seem to do better (e.g., live longer) if they’re above the so-called healthy body mass index of 18.5 to 24.9.  For instance: those with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and advanced kidney disease.

It’s never really been clear whether the average obese person (body mass index over 30) improves his longevity by losing some excess weight.  That’s what the study at hand is about.

Methodology

Baltimore-based investigators followed the health status of 585 overweight or obese older adults over the course of 12 years.  Half of them were randomized to an intentional weight loss intervention.  All of them had a high blood pressure diagnosis.  Average age was 66.  Average body mass index was 31.  Details of the weight-loss intervention are unclear, but it was probably along the lines of “eat less, exercise more.”

What Did They Find?

The weight-loss group lost and maintained an average of 4.4 kg (9.7 lb) over the 12 years of the study.  This is about 5% of initial body weight, the minimal amount thought to be helpful for improvement in weight-related medical problems.  Most of the weight loss was over the first three years.

The men assigned to the weight-loss program had about half the risk of dying over the course of the study, compared to the men not assigned to weight loss.  The authors don’t seem to put much stock in it, however, stating that “…no significant difference overall was found in all-cause mortality between older overweight and obese adults who were randomly assigned to an intentional weight-loss intervention and those who were not.” 

Comments

With regards to the men losing weight, we’re only talking about 100-150 test subjects, a relatively small number.  So I understand why the researchers didn’t make a big deal of the lower mortality: it may not be reproducible.

This same research group did a similar study of 318 arthritis patients and intentional weight loss, finding a 50% lower death rate over eight years.

The authors reviewed many similar studies done by other teams, noting increased death rates from weight loss in some studies, and lesser death rates in others. 

When the studies are all over the place like this, it usually means there’s no strong association either way.  Nearly all the pertinent studies were done on relatively healthy, middle-aged and older folks.  The most reliable thing you can say about the issue is that loss of excess fat weight doesn’t increase your odds of premature death. 

 Remember that patients with coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, or advanced kidney disease tend to live longer if they’re overweight or at least mildly obese.  It’s the obesity paradox.  Will they live longer or die earlier if they go on a weight-loss program?  We don’t know.

We do know that intentional weight loss helps:

• prevent type 2 diabetes
• maintain reasonable blood pressures (avoiding high blood pressure)
• improves lower limb functional ability

Maybe that’s enough.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Shea MK, Nicklas BJ, Houston DK, Miller ME, Davis CC, Kitzman DW, Espeland MA, Appel LJ, & Kritchevsky SB (2011). The effect of intentional weight loss on all-cause mortality in older adults: results of a randomized controlled weight-loss trial. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 94 (3), 839-46 PMID: 21775558

The very-low-carb Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet cures metabolic syndrome, according to investigators at the University of Córdoba in Spain. 

The metabolic syndrome is a collection of clinical factors that are linked to high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease.  Individual components of the syndrome include elevated blood sugar, high trigylcerides, low HDL cholesterol, high blood pressure,  and abdominal fat accumulation.

Spanish researchers put 26 people with metabolic syndrome on the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet for twelve weeks and monitored what happened.  At baseline, average age was 41 and average body mass index was 36.6.  Investigators didn’t say how many diabetics or prediabetics were included.  No participant was taking medication.

What’s the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet?

Calories are unlimited, but dieters are encouraged to keep carbohydrate  consumption under 30 grams day.  They eat fish, lean meat, eggs, chicken, cheese, green vegetables and salad, at least 30 ml (2 tbsp) daily of virgin olive oil,  and 200-400 ml of red wine daily ( a cup or 8 fluid ounces  equals 240 ml).  On at least four days of the week, the primary protein food is fish.  On those four days, you don’t eat meat, chicken, eggs, or cheese.  On up to three days a week, you could eat non-fish protein foods but no fish on those days. 

How’s this different from my Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet?  The major differences are that mine includes one ounce (28 g) of nuts daily, less fish overall, and you can mix fish and non-fish protein foods every day.

Regular exercisers were excluded from participation, and my sense is that exercise during the diet trial was discouraged. 

What Were the Results?

Metabolic syndrome resolved in all participants.

Three of the original 26 participants were dropped from analysis because they weren’t compliant with the diet.  Another one was lost to follow-up.  Final analysis was based on the 22 who completed the study.

Eight of the 22 participants had adverse effects.  These were considered slight and mostly appeared and  disappeared during the first week.  Effects included weakness, headache, constipation, “sickness”, diarrhea, and insomnia. 

Average weight dropped from 106 kg (233 lb) to 92 kg (202 lb).

Body mass index fell from 36.6 to 32.

Average fasting blood sugar fell from 119 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l) to 92 mg/dl (5.1 mmol/l).

Triglycerides fell from 225 mg/dl to 110 mg/dl.

Average systolic blood pressure fell from 142 mmHg to 124.

Average diastolic blood pressure fell from 89 to 76.

So What?

A majority of people labeled with metabolic sydrome continue in metabolic sydrome for years.  That’s because they don’t do anything effective to counteract it.  These researchers show that it can be cured in 12 weeks, at least temporarily, with the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet.

Very-low-carb diets are especially good at lowering trigylcerides, lowering blood sugar, and raising HDL cholesterol.  Overweight dieters tend to lose more weight, and more quickly, than on other diets.  Very-low-carb diets, therefore, should be particularly effective as an approach to metabolic syndrome.  It’s quite possible that other very-low-carb diets, such as Atkins Induction Phase, would have performed just as well as the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet.  In fact, most effective reduced-calorie weight-loss diets would tend to improve metabolic syndrome, even curing some cases, regardless of carb content. 

Most physicians recommend that people with metabolic syndrome either start or intensify an exercise program.  The program at hand worked without exercise.  I recommend regular exercise for postponing death and other reasons.

Will the dieters of this study still be cured of metabolic syndrome a year later?  Unlikely.  Most will go back to their old ways of eating, regaining the weight, and moving their blood sugars, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterols in the wrong direction.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Pérez-Guisado J, & Muñoz-Serrano A (2011). A Pilot Study of the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet: An Effective Therapy for the Metabolic Syndrome. Journal of medicinal food PMID: 21612461