Huge Study Confirms Health and Longevity Benefits of the Mediterranean Diet
Italian researchers reported in the September 11, 2008, online issue of the British Medical Journal what is already known:
“Greater adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with a significant improvement in health status, as seen by a significant reduction in overall mortality (9%), mortality from cardiovascular diseases (9%), incidence of or mortality from cancer (6%), and incidence of Parkinsons’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (13%). These results seem to be clinically relevant for public health, in particular for encouraging a Mediterranean-like dietary pattern for primary prevention of major chronic diseases.”
Methodology
Researchers, mostly at the University of Florence, performed a meta-analysis of 12 other published studies that looked at the effects of a Mediterranean-style eating pattern on health and longevity. [Meta-analyses are popular, in part, because they are cheap. This study required no specific funding.]
Most, if not all, of these 12 studies were observational, and involved 1,574,299 participants. Six of the 12 studies were in Mediterranean countries, the others were in the U.S., northern Europe, and Australia. Study participants were followed between 3.7 and 18 years.
The researchers devised their very own Mediterranean diet scale based on study participants’ intake of various foods. Participants were given a point if they had higher than average intake of vegetables, fruits, legumes, cereals, fish, and red wine during meals. They were given a point if they had lower than average intake of red meat, processed meats, and dairy products. Due to differences among the 12 studies, “the total adherence scores…varied from a minimum of 0 points indicating low adherence to a maximum of 7-9 points reflecting high adherence to a Mediterranean diet.”
[This version of a Mediterranean diet score is problematic. Curiously, olive oil - the predominant source of fat in the traditional Mediterranean - is not in the score. Olive oil is a key characteristic of the Mediterranean diet. Furthermore, the study authors also state that dairy products are ”presumed not to form part of a Mediterranean diet.” Most experts would argue that cheese and yogurt are a significant part of the Mediterranean diet, if only in low amounts. I also doubt that participants in the 12 original studies were surveyed whether they drank red wine -as contrasted with white - and whether it was with meals or not. I admit I did not read each of the 12 component studies. The underlying cause of this idiosyncratic definition of the Mediterranean diet is that the 12 original studies themselves used different definitions of the Mediterranean diet. The meta-analysts had to pigeonhole the data. There are a handful of respected Mediterranean diet scores in existence, but the authors of this study couldn’t apply them across the board due to database inconsistency or inadequacy.]
Results
“The cumulative analysis of 12 cohort studies shows that a two point increase [emphasis added] in the score for adherence to a Mediterranean diet determines a 9% reduction, in overall mortality, a 9% reduction in mortality from cardiovascular diseases, a 6% reduction in incidence of or mortality from neoplasm [cancer], and 13% reduction in incidence of Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.”
The only one of the 12 original studies focused on Alzheimer’s disease, and it showed a 17% reduction in participants with high adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The two studies that focused on Parkinson’s disease revealed a 7% reduction in men, and 15% reduction in women. These reduced incidence figures, again, apply to a two-point increase in Mediterranean diet adherence score.
Discussion
The authors indicate that their report is the first ever meta-analysis of the data associating the Mediterranean diet with reduced mortality and chronic disease in the general population. Congratulations, guys!
The authors’ idiosyncratic Mediterranean diet score is unusual and won’t be widely adopted. However, the 12 studies comprising the meta-analysis did have reasonable Mediterranean diet characteristics.
Combining Alzheimer’s data with Parkinson’s data doesn’t make sense to me, nor did the authors try to explain it. You could lump them into the category of “neurodegenerative diseases,” but they aren’t the only ones by any means. The single Alzheimer’s study, by the way, was quite small compared to the two Parkinson’s studies.
Nearly all the popular media stories reported the findings as I did in my first paragraph above, which may be misleading. The specific improvements in mortality and various disease rates is per two-point increase in Mediterranean diet score. For example, consider the 9% reduction in overall mortality. If a population increased its Mediterranean score by four points, would overall mortality be reduced by 18%? I’ve read this study four times and cannot answer my own question. But I suspect that the answer is “yes.” So the news here may better than it seems at first blush.
In other words: If a population’s score goes from 5 to 7, the death rate is reduced by 9%. If that same population then moved its score from 7 to 9, would mortality improve another 9%? I think so, but this study as written does not make it clear.
I’m starting to see why the popular media simplified the study findings. The reporting on this study is amazingly uniform. They must have all gotten the same news release.
Of course, “populations” don’t die or get cancer, heart attacks, strokes, Alzheimer’s, or Parkinson’s disease. Individuals do that. If I as an individual had a low Mediterranean diet score, I would try to improve my score by at least two points. A good place to start would be a review of the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid promoted by Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust (reproduced with permission):

Steve Parker, M.D., author of The Advanced Mediterranean Diet: Lose Weight, Feel Better, Live Longer
Reference: Sofi, Francesco, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status: Meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 337; a1344. Published online September 11, 2008. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1344
September 19th, 2008 at 10:57 am
Great analysis. It seems the take-home message is the mediterranean diet is a good one to follow with proof it is healthy.
thanks
September 21st, 2008 at 3:09 am
I am almost completely agree with your comments.
Our study is just a meta-analysis, i.e. a statistical approach that tries to obtain one single result from different studies performed with the same scope, and does not want to give any conclusive information about the role of Mediterranean diet.
Furthermore, the adherence score analysed in these studies is just one of the several attempts used by researchers for trying to identify the adherence to this kind of diet.
But, in my opinion, the real question is what is the Mediterranean diet? If anyone knows the right answer and has a correct definition, please let me know. I live in Italy, and I come from the south of Italy, i.e. where the Mediterranean diet should have been reported firstly, but when the person ask to me a correct definition of such diet I have no precise answer. This does not help to give correct information on what to eat for reducing the risk of disease.
Thanks for your interest in our article
September 21st, 2008 at 8:57 am
Thanks for the compliment Dr. Hubbard. I hope to spend some time at your blog soon.
And thank you very much, Dr. Sofi, for your comments. [For those not paying close attention, Dr. Sofi is the lead author of the BMJ article we’re discussing.]
One problem is that there simply is no immutable, monolithic Mediterranean diet. I think that medical/nutrition experts are slowly coming to a consensus as to what constitutes a healthy diet that would be acceptable to general populations (as opposed to Dr. Dean Ornish’s heart-healthy vegetarian program that will never be widely adopted).
What’s the consensus diet? Not much red meat, transfats, saturated fats, or highly processed foods. Favor poultry, fish, and (?) eggs over meat, as good sources of protein. Leaner types of meat, when eaten. Lots of plant-based foods: fruits, legumes, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, fiber. Moderate amounts of healthy oils such as olive, flaxseed, canola, omega-3 fatty acids from fish. Judicious amounts of wine, if not contraindicated.
The scientific literature refers to the consensus diet as Alternative Healthy Eating Index, Prudent Diet, Willett/Harvard Healthy Eating Pyramid, or the Meditarranean diet. The DASH diet is close, but doesn’t quite make the cut.
I propose “Mediterranean Diet” as the best moniker. Not only would it be easier to “market,” it has the most scientific literature to back it up.
-Steve
September 26th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
One hallmark of the Mediterranean diet is that it is low in omega-6 fat, a fact that is often neglected in spite of the studies indicating its significance!
Examples:
- The Lyon Diet Heart Study–
which popularized the health benefits of eating a Mediterranean diet was designed and implemented as a low dietary omega-6 fat of 7 grams, because the researchers determined that it was one of the key features of eating a Mediterranean diet. (Olive oil is very low in omega-6 fat, and is primarily oleic acid, an omega-9 fatty acid).
( de Lorgeril, M Mediterranean Diet… Report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study Circulation 99: 779-785.)
-Greece, lsand of Crete-
The Greek Mediterranean diet, as exemplified by the diet of Crete, is associated with the longest life expectancy and lowest rate of cardiovascular disease. It is a low omega-6 fat. And this is the Mediterranean diet, which the Lyon Diet Heart was patterned.
(Simopoulos AP.What is so special about the diet of Greece? The scientific evidence. World Rev Nutr Diet, 2005. )
-The Chianti Study–
The population of two small towns in Tuscany, Italy, eat a low omega-6 fat, with an average intake of 7 grams of polyunsaturated fats (PUFA) per day.
(Ferrucci L et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2006.)
Evelyn Tribole, MS, RD
http://omega-6-omega-3-balance.omegaoptimize.com/2008/09/14/how-much-omega6-fat-is-too-much.aspx
September 27th, 2008 at 12:12 am
Thanks for your comments, Evelyn. I admit I’m not entirely up to date on the omega-6 issue, but will get there with your help.
[Evelyn Tribole is the author of “The Ultimate Omega-3 Diet” and “Intuitive Eating.”]
-Steve
October 7th, 2008 at 3:14 am
Interesting Diet Pyramid. Thanks for sharing.
October 9th, 2008 at 8:21 am
Great analysis, thanks for the link. I was wondering about the olive oil and dairy as well.
I think we can agree this is a nice attempt to quantify adherence, although it reaches the limits of what a meta-analysis can achieve. But it would have also been nice to see a gradation of adherence, as you suggest.